For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Every page on this site is also served as Markdown: append `.md` to any URL, or send `Accept: text/markdown`.
Attensira Logo
Attensira
SEO Glossary

Search intent

What a person is actually trying to accomplish with a query, in Google's own four categories, and why an answer engine resolves it before it ever reaches your page.

Karl-Gustav KallasmaaKarl-Gustav Kallasmaa, Founder & CEOLast updated

Search intent is what a person is trying to accomplish with a query, as distinct from the words they typed. Google states the premise directly in How Search Works: "To return relevant results, we first need to establish what you're looking for – the intent behind your query."

The SEO industry usually splits intent four ways — informational, navigational, transactional, commercial investigation. That taxonomy is useful shorthand, but it is not Google's. Google's own vocabulary is published in the Search Quality Rater General Guidelines, version dated 11 September 2025, and it is worth using the real terms because they are more precise.

Google's four categories

The guidelines tell raters to think of queries as having one or more of the following intents:

  • Know — the intent is to find information or explore a topic. Within it, Know Simple queries seek a very specific answer, such as a fact or diagram, which "has to be correct and complete, and can be displayed in a relatively small amount of space." The stated rule: if most people would agree on a correct answer, and it would fit in one to two sentences or a short list, it is Know Simple.
  • Do — the intent is "to accomplish a goal or engage in an activity," which may mean to download, buy, obtain, be entertained by, or interact with a site or app.
  • Website — the user is looking for a specific website or webpage.
  • Visit-in-person — the user wants a business, an organisation, or a category of businesses they can go to.

Two details in the guidelines matter more than the list itself. Google explicitly says the line between Do and Know is "sometimes blurry" and tells raters not to worry about strictly differentiating them. And most queries are not Know Simple: the guidelines name broad or in-depth informational queries, ambiguous ones, controversial topics, queries with no definitive right answer, and queries where users want to browse, find inspiration, or read personal opinions.

Interpretations are graded separately from intents

The guidelines keep a second, orthogonal vocabulary for ambiguity. A dominant interpretation is "what most users mean when they type the query" — and Google notes that not all queries have one. A common interpretation is what many or some users mean, and a query can have several. A minor interpretation is one fewer users have in mind, split into reasonable minor interpretations, which help fewer users but are still legitimate, and unlikely minor interpretations, which are possible in theory but not worth serving.

Google's worked example is the query harvard: depending on need and location, users may want the official homepage (Website), directions (Visit-in-person), or information about the school (Know) — while a specific individual Harvard course is called out as an unlikely interpretation of so broad a query.

Why it decides whether you are cited

Because an answer engine resolves intent before your page is consulted, not after.

In a classic ranked list, a page matched to the query string but not to the goal still appears, and the user decides. In a conversational or AI-generated answer, the system reformulates the request into retrieval queries against the inferred goal, fetches passages, and drops anything that does not answer it. A page that is topically adjacent is retrieved and then discarded silently. There is no position four to fall back to.

Know Simple queries are also the ones most likely to end without a click at all, since the answer fits in the surface. That is the ordinary case of zero-click search and of featured snippets before it, and it is not a defect to be routed around — it is the intent being satisfied.

The failure modes

  • Answering a Know query with a Do page. The guidelines include this exact case: for a query seeking health information about egg salad, recipes with no nutritional information are "not a reasonable minor intent," because "the user issuing the query is specifically looking for health information, not food preparation."
  • Ignoring important words. Google's other worked example is a query for a non-emergency number, where returning the emergency number is judged unreasonable, with the note that "users can become frustrated when results ignore important words."
  • Serving one page to several intents. A query with two common interpretations needs two pages. A single page that hedges across both matches neither well enough to be the retrieved passage.
  • Assuming a dominant interpretation exists. Google says some queries have none. Building a page around a guess at "what people really mean" produces content for an intent a minority holds.
  • Treating intent as static. The guidelines note that as new products appear, the dominant interpretation of a query changes again.

How to act on it

  1. Classify before writing. Know, Know Simple, Do, Website or Visit-in-person — and write the page the category actually calls for.
  2. For Know Simple, put the answer in the first sentence, correct and complete, and short enough to be lifted whole.
  3. Split, don't hedge. Two common interpretations are two pages, each of which states its interpretation in its opening line.
  4. Honour the qualifying words. "Non-emergency", "without", "free", "for beginners" are the intent. A page that quietly drops them answers a different query.
  5. Re-check periodically. Intent for a query drifts as the underlying world changes; long-tail queries drift fastest.
Frequently Asked Questions about Search intent

Google's Search Quality Rater General Guidelines, dated 11 September 2025, tell raters to think of queries as having one or more of these intents: Know queries, some of which are Know Simple queries; Do queries, when the user is trying to accomplish a goal or engage in an activity; Website queries, when the user is looking for a specific website or webpage; and Visit-in-person queries. The informational, navigational and transactional split used across the SEO industry is an older taxonomy that maps loosely onto these.

Google's guidelines define it as a special type of Know query seeking a very specific answer, such as a fact or diagram, where the answer has to be correct and complete and can be displayed in a relatively small amount of space. The stated rule of thumb: if most people would agree on a correct answer and it would fit in one to two sentences or a short list of items, the query can be called a Know Simple query.

Yes, and Google instructs raters to expect it. The guidelines say many queries have more than one likely user intent and tell raters to err on the side of considering interpretations and intents to be reasonable. Google's worked example is the query harvard, where users may want the official homepage, directions, or information about the school.

It classifies them rather than scoring them. The guidelines define a dominant interpretation as what most users mean by a query, a common interpretation as what many or some users mean, and a minor interpretation as one fewer users have in mind, split further into reasonable and unlikely minor interpretations. Not all queries have a dominant interpretation.

The intent is resolved before your page is consulted, not after. A conversational system reformulates the request into one or more retrieval queries and fetches passages against those, so a page matched to a query string but not to the underlying goal is retrieved and then discarded. Know Simple queries are the ones most likely to be answered without a click at all.

Answering a Know query with a Do page. Google's guidelines include exactly this failure as a worked example: for a query seeking health information about egg salad, recipes that contain no nutritional information are called out as not a reasonable minor intent, with the note that people may be interested in recipes as a next step but the user issuing the query is looking for health information.
Share this term

Track how your brand shows up in ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI

Attensira monitors your visibility across AI search platforms so you know exactly when and how you're being recommended.