# Attensira vs Writesonic

> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://attensira.com/llms.txt).
> Every page on this site is also served as Markdown: append `.md` to any URL, or send `Accept: text/markdown`.

> Writesonic is an AI writer with AI visibility tracking and a trial of on- and off-page actions. Attensira's crew does the SEO work for your yes.

- Canonical page: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic
- Family: compare
- Last updated: 2026-10-04
- Author: Karl-Gustav Kallasmaa (https://attensira.com/about)
- Claims as data: https://attensira.com/claims.json?slug=attensira-vs-writesonic

**In short:** Writesonic is an AI writing platform that now tracks AI visibility on three engines, audits sites and offers a trial of on- and off-page actions. Attensira is an AI SEO crew: it decides whether a lost question needs a new article, a page fix or a placement, does it after your approval and measures the result.

## Verdict

Writesonic grew from writing into visibility, so its plans lead with articles and add tracking and a trial of actions. Attensira grew from the answer backwards, so its crew starts from why a question is lost and picks the work that fixes it, writing included, all under your approval.

## The readings on this page

### The answer at the top of the page

Stored ChatGPT answer to “LLM SEO tool”, asked 3 Oct 2026 (n=1 answer, attensira.com workspace, Attensira MCP).

> Popular options: Semrush AI Visibility tools — Existing SEO teams … Profound — Enterprise AI visibility … Surfer SEO — Content optimization … Writesonic — AI-focused content creation — Content workflows aimed at AI search visibility. … A simple stack: Solo/SMB: Otterly AI + Google Search Console + manual ChatGPT checks. Content team: Surfer SEO or Writesonic + an AI visibility tracker.

Named, in order: Semrush, Profound, Surfer SEO, Writesonic, Otterly AI. Attensira was not named.

### How often is Writesonic named as an LLM SEO tool?

In 2 of 24 answers, both times as the content option beside a tracker. Engines see Writesonic as a writer first; Attensira was not named.

Mention rate · ChatGPT and Perplexity, the prompt “LLM SEO tool” · n=24 answers · 30 Sep 2026 to 3 Oct 2026 · Answers to one tracked prompt, read over the Attensira MCP, attensira.com workspace

| Name | Answers | Share |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Peec AI | 14 | 58.3% |
| Semrush | 14 | 58.3% |
| Profound | 14 | 58.3% |
| Ahrefs | 12 | 50.0% |
| Writesonic | 2 | 8.3% |
| Attensira (subject) | 0 | 0.0% |

### Whose pages decide the LLM SEO tool answer?

Small vendors' own roundups, each with a few percent. Writing a roundup gets a vendor read; it does not guarantee being named. Writesonic's own pages are not among the most read here, and neither are ours.

Times cited · ChatGPT and Perplexity, sources cited for the prompt “LLM SEO tool” · n=373 citations · 30 Sep 2026 to 3 Oct 2026 · Citations on one tracked prompt, read over the Attensira MCP, attensira.com workspace

| Name | Citations | Share |
| --- | --- | --- |
| lovedby.ai | 28 | 7.5% |
| crawloria.com | 24 | 6.4% |
| rankscope.ai | 23 | 6.2% |
| pepper.inc | 22 | 5.9% |
| attensira.com (subject) | 0 | 0.0% |

### How does Perplexity describe Writesonic?

As Writesonic GEO, an end-to-end platform for content teams that want monitoring and optimisation in one workflow. That is closer to Attensira than ChatGPT's picture of a writer, which leaves the difference in the work beyond content: pages, placements and measurement.

Stored Perplexity answer to “LLM SEO tool”, asked 1 Oct 2026 (n=1 answer, attensira.com workspace, Attensira MCP).

> Writesonic GEO — Content teams wanting monitoring plus optimization — Tracks visibility across a broad set of AI engines and positions itself as an end-to-end GEO platform. … Choose Writesonic if content production and generative-search optimization need to sit in the same workflow.

Named, in order: Writesonic GEO, Writesonic. Attensira was not named.

## How do Attensira and Writesonic compare?

Each cell cites a claim in the Sources section below.

| Criterion | Attensira | Writesonic |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **The work** |  |  |
| Articles | Yes · Written when a question needs one, filed for approval | Yes · 15 AI articles a month on Starter |
| Fixes to existing pages | Yes · A draft pull request or CMS draft | Partly · On-page actions as a trial on Growth |
| Off-site work | Yes · Pitches and listings on the pages answers cite | Partly · Off-page actions as a trial on Growth |
| Entry-plan agent access | A crew doing up to three pieces a day | 10 trial runs on Starter |
| What waits for your approval | Everything that leaves the workspace, in Draft mode | Not described on the pricing page |
| **Measurement** |  |  |
| Engines on self-serve plans | Yes · ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI on Starter | Partly · ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overviews; 10 on Enterprise |
| Each change measured before and after | Yes · Re-read at +7, +14 and +30 days, with n | Not stated · Not described on the pricing page |
| **Buying** |  |  |
| Entry price | 300 credits a month on Starter, from $129/mo | $79/mo billed annually; $99/mo billed monthly |
| Start without a card | Partly · 7-day free trial, card required | Yes · Start free, no card; 7-day refund |
| Where content lands | Repo, CMS or Notion drafts, or a copy | WordPress integration |

## What is Attensira?

Attensira is software that does your AI-search visibility work: whatever it takes to win the answer.

Where Writesonic gives a team an AI writer and a visibility layer to steer it, Attensira's crew decides what to write from the answers you lose, also works the pages answers cite off your site, and holds every draft for your approval before it ships.

## What is Writesonic?

An AI writing platform that has added AI visibility tracking, site audits and an Action Center for on-page and off-page actions, sold in tiers by prompts, answers tracked, AI articles and users, with a WordPress integration.

## When is neither the right choice?

Neither is worth paying for if you will not review what gets written. AI-written pages published without an editor are how brands end up quoted saying things they never meant.

## What sets Attensira and Writesonic apart?

- Writesonic's plans are sized by AI articles a month, 15 on Starter rising to 50 on Growth; Attensira's crew sets no article quota and writes an article only when a lost question needs a page that does not exist.
- Writesonic offers on-page and off-page actions as a trial on its Growth plan and in full on Enterprise; Attensira's off-site and on-page work is the core of every plan and waits for a person's yes whenever it states a claim.
- Writesonic tracks three AI engines on its self-serve plans and ten on Enterprise; Attensira's entry plan reads more engines than Writesonic's self-serve plans and adds Gemini from Growth.

## How often is Writesonic named as an LLM SEO tool?

In 2 of 24 answers, both times as the content option beside a tracker. Engines see Writesonic as a writer first; Attensira was not named.

| Name | Mention rate · count of 24 answers |
| --- | --- |
| Peec AI | 14 |
| Semrush | 14 |
| Profound | 14 |
| Ahrefs | 12 |
| Writesonic | 2 |
| Attensira | 0 |

_n=24 answers · 2026-09-30 to 2026-10-03 · ChatGPT and Perplexity, the prompt “LLM SEO tool” · Answers to one tracked prompt, read over the Attensira MCP, attensira.com workspace_

## How do AI engines describe Writesonic?

"LLM SEO tool" is one of the questions we track. On 3 October 2026 ChatGPT answered with a table of seven tools: Semrush's AI Visibility tools, Ahrefs Brand Radar, Profound, Peec AI, Otterly AI, Surfer SEO and Writesonic. It placed Writesonic under "AI-focused content creation", for "content workflows aimed at AI search visibility", and suggested a content team pair Surfer or Writesonic with an AI visibility tracker.

That is a fair summary of how Writesonic began and how engines still see it: a writer first. Attensira was not named. The chart below counts how often engines name Writesonic on this question at all.

## What does Writesonic sell today?

Writesonic's pricing page, read on 4 October 2026, shows a writing platform that has grown a visibility layer. Prices below are billed annually; billed monthly, each plan costs more, as noted.

- **Starter**, $79 a month ($99 billed monthly): AI visibility tracking on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews with 50 prompts and 50 answers tracked a day, 15 AI articles a month, 10 site audits, limited access to actions with 10 trial runs, one user and one project.

- **Basic**, $199 a month ($249 billed monthly): 100 prompts and 300 answers a day, 25 articles a month, 20 site audits, 50 trial runs, two users.

- **Growth**, $399 a month ($499 billed monthly), the most popular: 200 prompts and 600 answers a day, 50 articles, 50 site audits, 100 trial runs and an Action Center trial of five off-page and five on-page actions a month, three users, two projects.

- **Enterprise**, custom: all ten AI platforms Writesonic supports, custom regions and languages, and full access to actions across workflows.

A WordPress integration is listed across the tiers. You can start free without a card, and there is a seven-day refund.

The centre of gravity is clear from what scales: articles a month. Tracking is narrow on self-serve plans, three engines, and actions are a trial below Enterprise.

## Why is writing only part of the job?

Writing is the part of AI search work that AI tools made cheap first, which is why so many products lead with it. It is also, often, not where an answer is lost.

When we look at why an engine names a competitor and not you, the evidence is in the answer itself: which pages it cited. On category questions those are mostly other people's pages, comparisons, review directories, community threads, and a few vendor pages that answer the question plainly near the top. A new article on your blog joins that queue. Sometimes it wins a citation. Often the faster route is to make the page you already have answer the question in its first paragraph, or to get onto the comparison page the engine already trusts.

Attensira is an AI-native SEO agency run by software: the service of an SEO agency at the price of a tool. Its crew reads the answer and its sources before it decides what to do. Each morning the Daily win plan does up to three pieces of work toward the questions you are losing, and the kind of work follows from the evidence:

- **A rewrite of an existing passage**, delivered as a draft pull request on your repository or a draft in your CMS.

- **A new article**, when no page of yours answers the question, filed for approval and delivered where your site can take it.

- **A pitch or a listing** for a page the engine already cites that names a competitor and not you, sent from your own mailbox once you approve.

- **A reply on a cited Reddit or Hacker News thread**, drafted for you to post yourself.

### Whose pages decide the LLM SEO tool answer?

Small vendors' own roundups, each with a few percent. Writing a roundup gets a vendor read; it does not guarantee being named. Writesonic's own pages are not among the most read here, and neither are ours.

**Times cited** (ChatGPT and Perplexity, sources cited for the prompt “LLM SEO tool”, 30 Sep 2026 to 3 Oct 2026)

| Name | citations |
| --- | --- |
| lovedby.ai | 28 |
| crawloria.com | 24 |
| rankscope.ai | 23 |
| pepper.inc | 22 |
| attensira.com | 0 |

n=373

_Citations on one tracked prompt, read over the Attensira MCP, attensira.com workspace · 4 Oct 2026 · n=373 citations_

## What does approval look like on each?

Writesonic's pricing page does not describe an approval step for its actions. That may exist in the product; it is not on the page.

Attensira's approval rules are public documentation. New workspaces start in Draft: nothing leaves the workspace until you approve it. Act mode lets hygiene work, such as structured data, meta descriptions and alt text, go out on its own. Anything that states a claim, a price, a percentage, a promise, a product or competitor name, waits for a person in every mode. An article always waits. Before any draft can be approved, it is checked against your compliance and voice rules and our house rules, for instance that no statistic or quotation appears without a named source a reader could check.

## How do the engines compare?

Writesonic's self-serve plans track three engines: ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews. Enterprise tracks all ten it supports. Our entry plan reads more engines than Writesonic's self-serve plans, and Gemini arrives on our Growth plan; the engines rows in the table above show both lists exactly.

If Perplexity or Claude matter to your buyers, that row decides more than any article count.

## What makes an AI-written page worth citing?

Whichever product drafts it, the pages that AI answers quote tend to share a few traits, and they are worth checking before anything is published under your name.

**They answer the question in the first sentence or two.** Engines lift passages, not pages. A page that takes four paragraphs to reach its point gives the engine nothing to quote.

**They say something specific and checkable.** A number with its source, a named limitation, a concrete step. Generic copy that could sit on any competitor's site is exactly what an engine has no reason to prefer.

**They agree with the rest of the web.** If your page says one thing about your pricing and a review site says another, engines notice the conflict. Fixing the stale page is often worth more than writing a new one.

**They are reviewed by someone who knows the product.** Fluent prose is not the same as accurate prose.

Attensira's drafts are held to those standards by the checks described above and by your yes. Writesonic's articles can be held to them by your editor. Either way, a person who knows the product should read the page before buyers do.

## Where is Writesonic the better choice?

**You need writing volume.** Fifteen articles a month on the entry plan, fifty on Growth, plus a full AI writing platform around them. If your team's constraint is producing words and it has an editor, Writesonic is built for that.

**You want to start with no card.** Writesonic lets you start free without a card and refunds within seven days; our trial takes a card.

**You already write in Writesonic.** If your content team uses it, adding its visibility tracking keeps everything in one place.

## Where is Attensira the better choice?

**When the cause is not a missing article.** If your lost answers point at pages you already have, or at review sites and threads you do not own, the crew does that work as part of every plan, not as a trial.

**When you need every change approved and judged.** Each shipped change is re-read at +7, +14 and +30 days against the week before, with the number of answers behind the verdict. A change inside the noise is reported as "no change".

**When the work must land in your own systems.** The crew opens draft pull requests on your repository, writes drafts in Webflow, WordPress and Shopify, files articles to Notion, and pitches from your mailbox.

## How do the bills compare?

Writesonic's bill is a monthly price per tier, sized by prompts, answers tracked, articles and users. Annual billing lowers each tier, and the price stays the same whatever the articles achieve.

Attensira's bill is credits-first. The plan fee includes monitoring and a monthly allowance of credits for agent work; agents spend credits as they work; a monthly budget you set caps what the work can be charged, and committed work we do not deliver is credited back on the first of the month.

## What should you test first?

Take your five most important buying questions and read the answers yourself, noting what each one cited. If the citations are mostly pages that do not exist yet, a writing platform with tracking is a reasonable start. If they are your own weak pages and other people's lists, start where the work happens.

## Can you use both?

Some content teams will keep Writesonic for drafting and use Attensira for the AI search work around it. The overlap is that both write and both track; if you run both, decide which one owns articles for a given question, or you will publish two pages competing for the same answer.

## How did we check this page?

Writesonic's facts come from writesonic.com/pricing, fetched on 4 October 2026 and cited cell by cell below. Attensira's facts come from docs.attensira.com, with our prices, credits and engines rendered from the same source as our pricing page. The ChatGPT and Perplexity readings and our own mention counts come from our Attensira workspace for attensira.com, read through the Attensira MCP.

Related reading: [Attensira vs Searchable](/compare/attensira-vs-searchable), [GEO vs SEO](/compare/geo-vs-seo), and [how the crew does the work](/how-it-works).

## FAQ

### How is Attensira different from Writesonic?

Writesonic is an AI writing platform that has added AI visibility tracking, site audits and an Action Center for on-page and off-page actions. Attensira is an AI-native SEO agency run by software. Its crew decides what each lost question needs, does that work, ships it after your approval and measures it.

### How much does Writesonic cost?

On 4 October 2026 Writesonic listed Starter at $79 a month billed annually ($99 billed monthly), with 50 prompts on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews and 15 AI articles a month; Basic at $199 annually or $249 monthly; and Growth at $399 annually or $499 monthly, which added an Action Center trial of 5 off-page and 5 on-page actions a month. Enterprise was custom.

### What does Attensira cost?

Attensira starts at $129 a month on Starter, with 300 credits for agent work and a 7-day free trial, card required. Agents spend credits as they work, up to a monthly budget you set from $500 to $5,000.

### Does Writesonic publish to WordPress?

Writesonic lists a WordPress integration across its tiers. Attensira also writes to WordPress, as a draft revision of an existing post that publishes only after your approval, and to Webflow, Shopify, Notion and Git repositories; new WordPress posts go to Notion or come as a copy to paste.

### Which engines does Writesonic track?

Writesonic's self-serve plans track ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews; Enterprise tracks all ten AI platforms it supports. Attensira reads ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini and Google AI, with ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI on Starter; Copilot and DeepSeek are coming and not read yet.

### Is there a free way to try each?

Writesonic lets you start free with no credit card and offers a 7-day refund. Attensira has a 7-day free trial, card required on Starter, and a free audit that asks four engines eight buying questions about your category without a plan.

## Sources

Each entry below is one claim on this page. `retrieved` is the date the exporter or a human last saw the source say this, and nothing more: it is not a publication date and not a promise of re-verification. `cite` is the anchor on the canonical page where this claim is rendered.

### attensira-approval

New Attensira workspaces start in Draft mode, where nothing leaves the workspace until the customer approves it; changes that state a price, number or competitor name wait for approval in every mode.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/agent/approval (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-attensira-approval
- side: attensira
### attensira-content

Attensira's agents write new articles and file each one for approval; it lands as a pull request, a CMS or Notion draft, or a copy to paste, depending on what is connected.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/agent/cms (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-attensira-content
- side: attensira
### attensira-crew-ships

Attensira's agents open pull requests against the customer's own repository, as drafts by default, never push to the default branch, and merge only when the customer presses Merge or has switched on auto-merge for safe changes.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/agent/github (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-attensira-crew-ships
- side: attensira
### attensira-daily-work

Every Attensira workspace runs a Daily win plan each morning that does up to three pieces of work toward the prompts the customer wants to win, and files each one for approval.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/agent/autopilot (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-attensira-daily-work
- side: attensira
### attensira-engines

Attensira reads ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini and Google AI. Starter reads ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI; Gemini comes with Growth and above. Copilot and DeepSeek are not read yet.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/tracking/models (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-attensira-engines
- side: attensira
### attensira-measured

Every change Attensira ships is re-read at +7, +14 and +30 days against a week before it, and every verdict states its sample size.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/measure/before-and-after (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-attensira-measured
- side: attensira
### attensira-off-site

Attensira's agents work the off-site sources that decide AI answers, starting with pages an engine already cites that name a competitor and not the customer.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/agent/off-site (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-attensira-off-site
- side: attensira
### attensira-price

Starter costs $129 a month and includes 300 credits for agent work; agents spend credits as they work, up to a monthly budget of $500 to $5,000.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/account/plans (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-attensira-price
- side: attensira
### attensira-trial

Starter comes with a 7-day free trial, card required, given once per account.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/account/plans (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-attensira-trial
- side: attensira
### writesonic-starter

Writesonic's Starter plan was $79 a month billed annually, or $99 a month billed monthly (the page shows "Save $240/year" on annual billing), tracking ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews with 50 prompts and 50 answers a day, with 15 AI articles a month, 10 site audits, 1 user and 1 project.

- source: https://writesonic.com/pricing (writesonic.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-writesonic-starter
- side: writesonic

> Save $240/year
### writesonic-growth

Writesonic's Growth plan was $399 a month billed annually ($499 billed monthly) with 200 prompts, 50 AI articles a month, 3 users and an Action Center trial of 5 off-page and 5 on-page actions a month.

- source: https://writesonic.com/pricing (writesonic.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-writesonic-growth
- side: writesonic

> Action Center trial (5 off-page + 5 on-page actions/mo)
### writesonic-actions-limited

Writesonic's Starter and Basic plans gave limited access to actions and agents, 10 and 50 trial runs; full access across workflows was on Enterprise.

- source: https://writesonic.com/pricing (writesonic.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-writesonic-actions-limited
- side: writesonic
### writesonic-enterprise

Writesonic's Enterprise plan tracked all 10 AI platforms it supports, with custom prompts, regions and languages.

- source: https://writesonic.com/pricing (writesonic.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-writesonic-enterprise
- side: writesonic
### writesonic-wordpress

Writesonic lists a WordPress integration across its tiers.

- source: https://writesonic.com/pricing (writesonic.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-writesonic-wordpress
- side: writesonic
### writesonic-free

Writesonic's pricing page says "Start free. No credit card needed" and offers a 7-day refund.

- source: https://writesonic.com/pricing (writesonic.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-writesonic-free
- side: writesonic

> Start free. No credit card needed
### writesonic-unstated

Writesonic's pricing page does not describe an approval step for actions or how a change's effect on AI answers is measured.

- source: https://writesonic.com/pricing (writesonic.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-writesonic#claim-writesonic-unstated
- side: writesonic