# Attensira vs KIME

> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://attensira.com/llms.txt).
> Every page on this site is also served as Markdown: append `.md` to any URL, or send `Accept: text/markdown`.

> KIME's AWX agent writes content, fixes structure and pursues placements. How Attensira's crew differs on volume, approval and proof.

- Canonical page: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime
- Family: compare
- Last updated: 2026-10-04
- Author: Karl-Gustav Kallasmaa (https://attensira.com/about)
- Claims as data: https://attensira.com/claims.json?slug=attensira-vs-kime

**In short:** KIME and Attensira both do the work. KIME tracks AI engines and its AWX agent writes content, fixes technical structure and pursues placements, metered in agentic executions a month. Attensira's crew does daily SEO work toward the questions you lose, ships it after your approval and measures each change.

## Verdict

KIME and Attensira are the rare pair in this category that both sell the work. They differ in how the work is metered, how much of it a plan includes, and how much of the process, approval and proof, is written down where a buyer can read it before signing.

## The readings on this page

### The answer at the top of the page

Stored Perplexity answer to “best AI search visibility tools for agencies”, asked 3 Oct 2026 (n=1 answer, attensira.com workspace, Attensira MCP).

> Profound, Mangools AI Search Grader, and BeOmniscient are among commonly cited AI visibility tools for agencies and brands in 2026. Other notable options include BirdEye, Ahrefs, KIME, Trustmary, and AEO Vision, each offering features like visibility scoring, citation authority, and AI engine monitoring.

Named, in order: Profound, Mangools AI Search Grader, BeOmniscient, BirdEye, Ahrefs, KIME, Trustmary, AEO Vision. Attensira was not named.

### How often is KIME named when an agency asks for tools?

In 2 of 78 answers. The monitoring incumbents own this question; KIME is at its edge and Attensira is not in it yet.

Mention rate · ChatGPT and Perplexity, the prompt “best AI search visibility tools for agencies” · n=78 answers · 21 Sep 2026 to 4 Oct 2026 · Answers to one tracked prompt, read over the Attensira MCP, attensira.com workspace

| Name | Answers | Share |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Semrush | 64 | 82.1% |
| Profound | 63 | 80.8% |
| Peec AI | 59 | 75.6% |
| Otterly.AI | 49 | 62.8% |
| KIME | 2 | 2.6% |
| Attensira (subject) | 0 | 0.0% |

### Whose pages decide which tools agencies are shown?

One review site and the two monitoring leaders' own pages are read most. Vendors that publish their own agency guides get read; the rest depend on review sites. Attensira's pages are not read for this question yet, which is where the crew starts on our own site.

Times cited · ChatGPT and Perplexity, sources cited for the prompt “best AI search visibility tools for agencies” · n=2,024 citations · 21 Sep 2026 to 4 Oct 2026 · Citations on one tracked prompt, read over the Attensira MCP, attensira.com workspace

| Name | Citations | Share |
| --- | --- | --- |
| toolsolved.com | 167 | 8.3% |
| peec.ai | 98 | 4.8% |
| otterly.ai | 89 | 4.4% |
| rankability.com | 72 | 3.6% |
| attensira.com (subject) | 0 | 0.0% |

### How did Perplexity describe KIME when it went further?

Six days earlier it gave KIME its own row for agencies wanting tracking plus execution, with a caution worth repeating: check whether the action features fit your editorial, PR and approval workflow. That is the question our approval documentation answers in public.

Stored Perplexity answer to “best AI search visibility tools for agencies”, asked 27 Sep 2026 (n=1 answer, attensira.com workspace, Attensira MCP).

> KIME — Agencies that want tracking plus execution support — Tracks nine AI surfaces and offers presence, share of voice, sentiment, citation analytics, plus an action/API layer. — Assess whether its “action” features actually fit your editorial, PR, and approval workflow.

Named, in order: KIME. Attensira was not named.

## How do Attensira and KIME compare?

Each cell cites a claim in the Sources section below.

| Criterion | Attensira | KIME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **The work** |  |  |
| Does it do the work | Yes · Fixes, articles, placements, replies | Yes · Content, technical fixes, placements |
| How much work a plan includes | Up to three pieces a day, paid in credits | 10 executions a month on Explorer |
| Where a change lands | A draft pull request or CMS draft | Not stated on the pages we read |
| What waits for your approval | Everything that leaves the workspace, in Draft mode | Not stated on the pages we read |
| **Measurement** |  |  |
| Engines on the entry plan | Yes · ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI | Partly · 2 of the 10 it tracks |
| Engines in total | Partly · 5: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini and Google AI | Yes · Ten, including Grok, DeepSeek, Copilot |
| Each change measured before and after | Yes · Re-read at +7, +14 and +30 days, with n | Not stated · Not stated on the pages we read |
| **Buying** |  |  |
| Entry price | 300 credits a month on Starter, from $129/mo | €99/mo Explorer |
| Trial | Yes · 7-day free trial, card required | Yes · 7 days, no card, no demo |
| Workspaces and seats | Yes · No plan counts workspaces | Yes · Unlimited workspaces; 5 seats, 10 on Core |

## What is Attensira?

Attensira is software that does your AI-search visibility work: whatever it takes to win the answer.

Like KIME, Attensira runs agents that do the work. Its crew does up to three pieces a day toward the questions you choose, lands each as a draft pull request, CMS draft or mailbox draft, holds it for your yes and re-reads the answer at +7, +14 and +30 days.

## What is KIME?

An AI visibility platform that tracks how AI models describe, rank and cite a brand across ten engines, with an agent, AWX, that executes tasks such as writing content, fixing technical structure and pursuing third-party placements, metered in agentic executions a month.

## When is neither the right choice?

Neither is the right call if you are not ready to approve work every week. An agent that does the work still needs a person to say yes; if nobody will, start with tracking and come back.

## What sets Attensira and KIME apart?

- KIME and Attensira both sell an agent that writes content, fixes pages and pursues placements, which sets this pair apart from every tracker-versus-Attensira comparison on this site; the differences are in metering, volume and what each publishes about its process.
- KIME meters its agent in agentic executions, 10 a month on Explorer; Attensira's Daily win plan can do up to three pieces of work a day, paid in credits up to a budget you set, and states what a budget buys before you agree to it.
- Attensira's approval modes, change classes and before-and-after method are public documentation; KIME's homepage and pricing page do not describe where AWX publishes or what waits for a person.

## How often is KIME named when an agency asks for tools?

In 2 of 78 answers. The monitoring incumbents own this question; KIME is at its edge and Attensira is not in it yet.

| Name | Mention rate · count of 78 answers |
| --- | --- |
| Semrush | 64 |
| Profound | 63 |
| Peec AI | 59 |
| Otterly.AI | 49 |
| KIME | 2 |
| Attensira | 0 |

_n=78 answers · 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-04 · ChatGPT and Perplexity, the prompt “best AI search visibility tools for agencies” · Answers to one tracked prompt, read over the Attensira MCP, attensira.com workspace_

## Why is this comparison different from the others?

Most pages in this section compare Attensira with a tool that measures AI answers and leaves the work to you. KIME is not that. Its homepage says that its agent, AWX, "executes those tasks, writing content, fixing technical structure and pursuing third-party placements". That is the same kind of promise Attensira makes, so the usual line, "they report, we do", would be false here. We will not use it.

KIME is at the edge of the answer; we are not in it yet. On 3 October 2026 Perplexity answered "best AI search visibility tools for agencies", one of the 61 questions we track for our own site, with Profound, Mangools AI Search Grader and BeOmniscient first, then KIME among "other notable options", with KIME's own blog post on AI visibility tools as a source. Attensira was not named. The chart below counts how often KIME is.

So this page compares two agent platforms on the things that decide whether an agent is safe and worth paying for: how much work you get, where it lands, who approves it, and how you find out whether it worked.

## What does KIME sell?

KIME describes itself as "an AI visibility platform that tracks how AI models describe, rank and cite your brand". It says it tracks ten AI engines in one workspace: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Copilot and Meta AI.

Its pricing page, read on 4 October 2026, listed:

- **Explorer**, €99 a month: 50 prompts tracked across 2 AI engines, unlimited workspaces, 5 seats, and AWX with 10 agentic executions a month.

- **Core**, €399 a month: 200 unique prompts across 3 engines, 10 seats, AWX with 30 agentic executions a month, onboarding support and extended account management.

- **Enterprise**, custom: a choice of all engines, 30 to 50 seats and 40 to 100 executions a month, with Slack support and quarterly workshops.

Both self-serve plans come with a seven-day trial that needs no card and no demo. Quarterly billing takes 5% off and annual 15%. KIME says there are no per-seat or per-model fees.

## How does the work compare?

**Volume.** KIME counts its agent in agentic executions: 10 a month on Explorer, 30 on Core. The page does not define one, so we cannot say whether an execution is an article, a fix or a step. Attensira's Daily win plan does up to three pieces of work a day toward the questions you are losing, each a whole deliverable: a rewritten passage, an article, a pitch, a listing or a drafted reply. The work is paid in credits, and your monthly budget is shown as the work it buys, so many articles, page fixes and outreach pitches, before you agree to it.

**Where it lands.** KIME's pages do not say where AWX's changes are published. Attensira's do: a fix to a site in a Git repository becomes a pull request, opened as a draft by default, on a branch used once and never pushed twice; a site on Webflow or WordPress gets an unpublished draft in its own editor; a new article goes to a pull request, a CMS or Notion draft, or a copy to paste. Outreach goes from your own mailbox. Community replies are drafted for you to post.

**Who approves.** KIME's pages do not describe an approval step. Attensira's is public: workspaces start in Draft, where nothing leaves until you approve it; Act lets hygiene work, such as structured data and alt text, go on its own; and anything that states a claim, a price, a number, a product or competitor name, waits for a person in every mode.

**Proof.** KIME's pages do not describe how a change is measured. Attensira re-reads the questions each shipped change targeted at +7, +14 and +30 days, compares them with the week before, and states the sample size. "No change" and "too close to call" are verdicts.

None of this means KIME lacks these things; it means its public pages do not say. When you evaluate any agent that writes to your site, those four answers belong in writing before the trial ends.

### Whose pages decide which tools agencies are shown?

One review site and the two monitoring leaders' own pages are read most. Vendors that publish their own agency guides get read; the rest depend on review sites. Attensira's pages are not read for this question yet, which is where the crew starts on our own site.

**Times cited** (ChatGPT and Perplexity, sources cited for the prompt “best AI search visibility tools for agencies”, 21 Sep 2026 to 4 Oct 2026)

| Name | citations |
| --- | --- |
| toolsolved.com | 167 |
| peec.ai | 98 |
| otterly.ai | 89 |
| rankability.com | 72 |
| attensira.com | 0 |

n=2,024

_Citations on one tracked prompt, read over the Attensira MCP, attensira.com workspace · 4 Oct 2026 · n=2,024 citations_

## What does a safe agent on your website look like?

Once a product writes to your site, the questions change. A tracker that gets something wrong shows you a wrong number. An agent that gets something wrong can publish a wrong price, a false claim about a competitor, or a broken page. So the design of the guard rails matters as much as the quality of the writing.

Here is what Attensira's look like, all from our public documentation.

- **Every proposed change is classified from the diff itself**, not from what the agent says about it. Hygiene, such as structured data, meta descriptions, alt text and internal links, is "safe". Anything with a price, a percentage, a promise word, a competitor's or product's name, or a sentence of prose is a "claim". Code, CI configuration, lockfiles and anything outside the directories you named are "never", refused even with approval.

- **Claims wait for a person in every mode.** Approving a claim is the only way it is published.

- **Every draft is checked before anyone can approve it**, against your compliance and voice rules and our house rules: no statistic or quotation without a named source a reader could check, no claimed improvement without the before-and-after numbers behind it.

- **The repository connection asks for three permissions**, contents, pull requests and metadata, and nothing else. The crew never pushes to your default branch and never pushes twice to a branch.

Ask any agent vendor for the same list. If the answers are not written down, you will be relying on goodwill when something goes wrong. That is true of us as much as anyone, which is why ours are public.

## Where is KIME the better choice?

**You want to start without a card.** KIME's trial needs no card and no demo; ours takes a card.

**You need many seats or workspaces at entry.** Explorer includes unlimited workspaces and five seats, Core ten.

**You need engines we do not read.** KIME tracks ten in total, including Grok, DeepSeek, Copilot and Meta AI, though its self-serve plans read two or three of them. Compare that with the engines row above.

**You think in euros and quarters.** KIME bills in euros and discounts quarterly billing.

## Where is Attensira the better choice?

Attensira is an AI-native SEO agency run by software: the service of an SEO agency at the price of a tool. It is the better choice when you want more work, done under rules you can read before you buy.

On volume, a crew that can do up to three pieces of work a day has a very different ceiling from ten executions a month, though your budget sets how much of that ceiling you use. On engines, our entry plan reads more of them than KIME's Explorer does; the engines rows above show both. On process, everything that matters to a cautious buyer is in our public documentation: the approval modes, the classes of change the crew may make on its own, the files it may never touch, the three permissions its GitHub App asks for, and the method behind every before-and-after.

## How do the costs compare?

KIME's price is a fixed monthly fee per plan that includes prompts, engines, seats and a count of executions.

Attensira's price is credits-first. The plan fee includes monitoring and a monthly allowance of credits for agent work; agents spend credits as they work; your monthly budget caps what the work can be charged; and committed work we do not deliver is credited back on the first of the month.

## What should you ask in each trial?

Ask both the same four questions and get the answers in writing. When the agent changes my site, where does the change appear and can I read the diff first? What can it do without me, and what always waits for me? What is it never allowed to touch? And when a change ships, how will you show me whether it worked, and on how many answers? Our answers, in short: a change appears as a draft pull request on your repository or an unpublished draft in your CMS, and you read it before it ships. Anything that states a price, a number or a competitor's name waits for you in every mode. Each shipped change is re-read at +7, +14 and +30 days, and every verdict states its sample size. The documentation behind each answer is linked from the sources at the bottom of this page.

## How did we check this page?

KIME's facts come from kime.ai and kime.ai/pricing, fetched on 4 October 2026 and cited cell by cell below. Attensira's facts come from docs.attensira.com, with our prices, credits and engines rendered from the same source as our pricing page. The Perplexity reading and our own mention counts come from our Attensira workspace for attensira.com, read through the Attensira MCP. KIME is not a tracked competitor in that workspace, so its count comes from reading every stored answer to that question for the name.

Related reading: [Attensira vs Relixir](/compare/attensira-vs-relixir), [Attensira vs an SEO agency](/compare/attensira-vs-seo-agency), and [how the crew does the work](/how-it-works).

## FAQ

### How is Attensira different from KIME?

Both do the work, not only measure it. KIME tracks AI engines and its AWX agent writes content, fixes technical structure and pursues placements, metered in agentic executions a month. Attensira's crew does daily SEO work toward the questions you lose, ships it after your approval and measures every change.

### How much does KIME cost?

On 4 October 2026 KIME listed Explorer at €99 a month with 50 prompts on 2 AI engines and 10 agentic executions a month, and Core at €399 a month with 200 prompts on 3 engines and 30 executions. Both had a 7-day free trial with no sales call. Enterprise was custom.

### What does Attensira cost?

Attensira starts at $129 a month on Starter, with 300 credits for agent work and a 7-day free trial, card required. Agents spend credits as they work, capped by a monthly budget you set from $500 to $5,000.

### What is an agentic execution?

KIME's pricing page meters its AWX agent in agentic executions, 10 a month on Explorer and 30 on Core, without defining one on that page. Attensira meters work in credits instead, and states what a budget buys in articles, page fixes and outreach pitches before you agree to it.

### Which engines does each read?

KIME tracks ten engines in total, and its plans read 2 on Explorer and 3 on Core. Attensira reads ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini and Google AI, with ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI on Starter. Copilot and DeepSeek are coming and not read yet.

### Does KIME wait for approval before publishing?

The KIME pages we read do not say. Ask before you buy. Attensira's rule is public. New workspaces start in Draft, nothing leaves the workspace until you approve it, and anything that states a price, a number or a competitor's name waits for your yes in every mode.

## Sources

Each entry below is one claim on this page. `retrieved` is the date the exporter or a human last saw the source say this, and nothing more: it is not a publication date and not a promise of re-verification. `cite` is the anchor on the canonical page where this claim is rendered.

### attensira-approval

New Attensira workspaces start in Draft mode, where nothing leaves the workspace until the customer approves it; changes that state a price, number or competitor name wait for approval in every mode.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/agent/approval (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-attensira-approval
- side: attensira
### attensira-crew-ships

Attensira's agents open pull requests against the customer's own repository, as drafts by default, never push to the default branch, and merge only when the customer presses Merge or has switched on auto-merge for safe changes.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/agent/github (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-attensira-crew-ships
- side: attensira
### attensira-daily-work

Every Attensira workspace runs a Daily win plan each morning that does up to three pieces of work toward the prompts the customer wants to win, and files each one for approval.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/agent/autopilot (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-attensira-daily-work
- side: attensira
### attensira-engines

Attensira reads ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini and Google AI. Starter reads ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI; Gemini comes with Growth and above. Copilot and DeepSeek are not read yet.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/tracking/models (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-attensira-engines
- side: attensira
### attensira-measured

Every change Attensira ships is re-read at +7, +14 and +30 days against a week before it, and every verdict states its sample size.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/measure/before-and-after (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-attensira-measured
- side: attensira
### attensira-price

Starter costs $129 a month and includes 300 credits for agent work; agents spend credits as they work, up to a monthly budget of $500 to $5,000.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/account/plans (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-attensira-price
- side: attensira
### attensira-trial

Starter comes with a 7-day free trial, card required, given once per account.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/account/plans (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-attensira-trial
- side: attensira
### attensira-workspaces

No Attensira plan counts workspaces: each brand is its own workspace in one organisation, sharing the plan's prompts, responses and credits.

- source: https://docs.attensira.com/account/plans (docs.attensira.com)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-attensira-workspaces
- side: attensira
### kime-explorer

KIME's Explorer plan was €99 a month billed monthly, with 50 prompts tracked across 2 AI engines, unlimited workspaces, 5 seats and AWX with 10 agentic executions a month.

- source: https://kime.ai/pricing (kime.ai)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-kime-explorer
- side: kime
### kime-core

KIME's Core plan was €399 a month billed monthly, with 200 prompts across 3 AI engines, 10 seats, AWX with 30 agentic executions a month and onboarding support.

- source: https://kime.ai/pricing (kime.ai)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-kime-core
- side: kime
### kime-trial

KIME's Explorer and Core plans included a 7-day free trial with no credit card or demo required to begin.

- source: https://kime.ai/ (kime.ai)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-kime-trial
- side: kime
### kime-awx

KIME says "AWX then executes those tasks, writing content, fixing technical structure and pursuing third-party placements."

- source: https://kime.ai/ (kime.ai)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-kime-awx
- side: kime

> AWX then executes those tasks, writing content, fixing technical structure and pursuing third-party placements.
### kime-engines

KIME says it tracks ten AI engines in one workspace, naming ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Copilot and Meta AI.

- source: https://kime.ai/ (kime.ai)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-kime-engines
- side: kime
### kime-unstated

KIME's homepage and pricing page do not define an agentic execution, say where AWX's changes are published, or describe an approval step before they go live.

- source: https://kime.ai/pricing (kime.ai)
- retrieved: 2026-10-04
- cite: https://attensira.com/compare/attensira-vs-kime#claim-kime-unstated
- side: kime